Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310658›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025

The role of deer keds (Diptera: Hippoboscidae: Lipoptena and Neolipoptena) in occupational and public health.

Markus Braun, Doris Klingelhöfer, Dörthe Brüggmann, Isabelle Marie Kramer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Markus BraunInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. m.braun@med.uni-frankfurt.de.
Doris KlingelhöferInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Dörthe Brüggmann *Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Isabelle Marie Kramer *Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deer keds (Diptera: Hippoboscidae: Lipoptena and Neolipoptena) are bloodsucking arthropods that primarily feed on deer (family Cervidae) but can occasionally bite humans. The knowledge of their potential harm to wildlife, livestock, and pets is fragmentary. These ectoparasites have been historically understudied, as they were only considered nuisances to various occupational groups and the public. However, there is also mounting evidence that they may be pathogen vectors as several infectious disease agents, including Acinetobacter, Anaplasma, Bartonella, Borrelia, Coxiella, Francisella, Mycoplasma, Rickettsia, Chlamydia-like organisms, Trypanosoma, Babesia, and viruses such as Sigmavirus lipoptenae and Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus, have been detected in deer keds. In this context, deer keds should be considered a highly probable vector for Bartonella schoenbuchensis. Persons at risk include anyone who travels or resides in the habitats of deer keds, primarily forests and their immediate surroundings in the Northern Hemisphere, whether for leisure or work purposes, particularly in temperate regions of Europe, Siberia, China, and North America. They also occur in Central and South America, the Russian Federation, South Korea, Thailand, Japan, Algeria, and Southern Spain. The ongoing rise in temperatures due to climate change is likely to favor the spread of deer keds, as it alters host distributions and increases their activity levels. Measures to prevent bites include avoiding areas with a high occurrence of deer keds, wearing protective clothing, including permethrin-treated clothing, and conducting a thorough body check for deer keds and bite sites after spending time or working in a risk area. Medical professionals should consider deer ked bites in their differential diagnoses. To ensure occupational and public health safety, it is crucial to educate and train at-risk workers (such as woodsman, foresters, employees of national parks, naturalists, farmers, and veterinarians) and those recreating in forests (such as walkers, hikers, hunters, or mushroom pickers) about deer ked bites, their symptoms, and possible zoonotic implications. This review summarizes the recent knowledge regarding the health risks posed by deer keds, applicable to both occupational groups and anyone who may encounter them within their geographic distribution.

Indexed as

Allergic reactionArthropod-borne pathogenClimate changeDeer ked dermatitisOutdoor worker, hikerParasiteRange expansionVectorZoonotic pathogen

Identifiers

PMID41310658
PMCPMC12690882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.