Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310653›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2025

Trauma-informed healthcare from the perspectives of women who have experienced sexual violence in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Síofra Peeren, Elsa Montgomery, Angela Sweeney, Gilda Spaducci, Anjuli Kaul, Demelza Smeeth, Sian Oram

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Síofra PeerenKing's Women's Mental Health, Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. Siofra.peeren@kcl.ac.uk.
Elsa MontgomeryMethodologies Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Angela SweeneyService User Research Enterprise, Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Gilda SpaducciKing's Women's Mental Health, Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Anjuli KaulKing's Women's Mental Health, Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Demelza SmeethLambeth Health Determinants Research Collaboration, Department of Public Health, Lambeth Council, London, UK.
Sian OramKing's Women's Mental Health, Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual violence is a global public health problem with wide-ranging and long-term health impacts. Survivors may experience further harm when healthcare settings replicate dynamics of sexual violence (re-traumatisation), underscoring the need to understand survivor perspectives on how healthcare settings can prevent harm and promote healing (trauma-informed approaches). We synthesised qualitative research exploring healthcare experiences and expectations among female survivors of sexual violence in adulthood.

methodsSystematic review and meta-ethnography. We searched 14 electronic databases (upper date limit 13th February 2024), supplemented by citation tracking, to identify qualitative studies exploring healthcare experiences and expectations among female survivors of adulthood sexual violence. First- and second-order constructs (participant quotes and author interpretations) were extracted and synthesised using meta-ethnography, including reciprocal and refutational translations and a line of argument synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the CASP and COREQ tools, alongside additional criteria to document trauma-sensitive research considerations. Confidence in review findings was assessed using CERQual.

resultsFifty studies were synthesised, generating a conceptual model and line-of-argument synthesis positioning demonstrating trustworthiness as central to trauma-informed healthcare. Trust was built by countering key harms of sexual violence, illustrated in three themes. The first theme, name the violence, described how survivors needed time, safety, and reassurance to recognise and make sense of experiences of sexual violence, which was often hidden or minimised, to reduce self-blame and shame and begin to heal. The second theme, make sexual violence visible, explored how providers and services could challenge silencing by asking, believing, responding, and framing sexual violence as a human rights violation. The third theme, bear witness, emphasised the importance of affirming survivors' dignity, agency, and autonomy to counter the dehumanising effects of sexual violence.

conclusionsHealthcare can replicate the harms of sexual violence, but also holds unique potential to support healing when survivors are met with validation, affirmation, dignity, and respect. Demonstrating trustworthiness is central to this process and depends not only on individual provider actions but also on system-level conditions that shape safety, visibility, and equity. System-wide trauma-informed approaches are needed to build trust and address systemic conditions and practices that perpetuate harm and undermine healing.

Indexed as

Sex OffensesSurvivorsAdultAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchTrustHealthcareMeta-ethnographyQualitativeSexual violenceSurvivor researchSystematic reviewTrauma-informed approaches

Identifiers

PMID41310653
PMCPMC12763930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.