ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Interpretable machine learning approach for optimizing hospice care predictions using health assessment data.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetermining the appropriate end-of-life (EOL) care model within a short time frame is challenging and requires extensive experience. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have developed automatic systems for identifying the hospice care models: hospice home (HHC), inpatient (HIC), and shared care (HSC). This study aimed to determine the optimal hospice care model for EOL patients with machine learning (ML) methods based on health assessment data.
methodsWe employed high-performance ML methods to build prediction models that could predict the most appropriate hospice care service for each patient using their health assessment data. Furthermore, we employed the knowledge distillation technique to transfer knowledge from the best-performing ML model to a decision tree model for classification interpretation.
resultsExperiments were conducted on a dataset of 3,468 hospice patients from National Cheng Kung University Hospital (2005-2020). ML models were built and validated, achieving high performance, with a macro-F1 score of 0.88 and an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.95. In addition, an interpretable decision tree model was generated, which maintained high performance while providing clear, visualizable decision paths for the best hospice care model.
conclusionML models were developed using health assessment data to explore their potential in guiding the selection of hospice care services for end-of-life patients. The findings demonstrate a data-driven approach that may support more informed and personalized clinical decisions, while representing an initial proof of concept for integrating ML into hospice care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.