ArticleBMC medical education2025
Application of scenario simulation based on boppps model in physical diagnostics--a practical exploration of integrated teaching mode for cardiac physical examination and electrocardiogram.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePhysical diagnosis is a bridging course that connects basic medicine and clinical medicine. This article took cardiac physical examination as an example, based on the student-centered BOPPPS(the bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary)model teaching, using imported CBL model (Case-Based Learning) and combined with scenario simulation to fully integrate students into the classroom, enhancing the mastery of theoretical knowledge and the ability to apply it in practice.
methodThe study focused on undergraduate students majoring in clinical medicine from the 2022 cohort of our university. The control group consisted of 38 students who received traditional teaching methods, while the experimental group consisted of 38 students who received blended learning using the BOPPPS model and scenario simulation method. They were evaluated by formative assessment (35%), summative assessment (65%), and overall score. Teaching satisfaction were assessed the form of a questionnaire survey.
resultsThe assessments showed that the experimental group scored higher than the control group in the summative assessment and overall score (76.68 ± 11.20 vs 69.25 ± 10.97 and 76.46 ± 8.95 vs 70.62 ± 8.80), and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The results of the teaching satisfaction questionnaire survey indicated that the experimental group scored higher than the control group in terms of teachers' teaching attitude, teaching ability, teaching content, teaching methods, and teaching effectiveness, and all had statistical differences (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in scores between the two groups in formative assessment.
conclusionsThe BOPPPS teaching model, when integrated with case-based learning and scenario simulation in physical diagnostics instruction, was associated with higher summative and total scores as well as greater student satisfaction compared to traditional instruction. Although no significant difference was observed in formative assessment performance between groups, the approach may help support student engagement and self-directed learning ability. Overall, participants reported higher satisfaction with this teaching model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.