ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Intersecting injustices: child marriage and the law in conflict-affected Sudan.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Intersecting injustices: child marriage and the law in conflict-affected Sudan.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudan is the only country in North Africa that is yet to reform its family law embodied by the Personal Status Act for Muslims of 1991. This law legalises child marriage, contradicts the National Child Act of 2010 that outlaws child marriage. This study aimed to understand how the pluralistic legal system in Sudan affects the occurrence and circumstances of child marriage in Kassala State in the context of the current war, to inform future advocacy efforts to ban child marriage. Thirteen key informants were interviewed in Kassala state and at the national level, complemented by one focus group discussion (FGD) at national level. In Kassala state, seven FGDs and eight in-depth interviews were held with young people who married as children and with parents whose children married under 18 years. Data were transcribed and coded, after which thematic analysis was undertaken. The findings affirm that child marriage is a commonplace practice, often justified by religion, driven by financial incentives and the on-going war. The closure of schools since 2023, abuses of girls by armed forces, and growing financial precarity are prompting parents to marry their daughters early. Community informants displayed a lack of awareness regarding the laws around child marriage and the legal minimum age of marriage. Contradictions between the laws create confusion and leave room for different interpretations, which are influenced by religion and social norms, further complicating the legal landscape. Although mazons (local marriage registrars) are mandated to follow civil law, they officiate underage marriages to conform to ‘local culture’, due to parental pressure, or because of false age certificates presented by families. Previous legal reform efforts failed to create consensus among religious hardliners and activists. Sudan’s pluralistic legal system has institutionalised gender inequality and legitimised the culturally accepted practice of child marriage. A future post-war recovery period might provide a window of opportunity for law reform. Sudan could build on successful strategies used by neighbouring countries to reform the family law. Policy and legal reform need to be accompanied by broader social and economic change, including advances in gender equality, to address child marriage in Sudan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.