Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310576›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025

Therapists' reasons for including horses into psychotherapy, a qualitative study.

Norunn Kogstad, Sunniva Elisabeth Christiansen, Randi Ulberg, Charlotte Fiskum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norunn KogstadDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. nkogstad@gmail.com.
Sunniva Elisabeth ChristiansenDepartment of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Randi UlbergInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Charlotte FiskumDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. charlotte.fiskum@ntnu.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of horses into psychotherapy has gained popularity over recent decades, offering unique therapeutic opportunities that may enhance emotional healing, empathy, and relational trust. This study investigates the perspectives of experienced psychotherapists on why they incorporate horses into their therapeutic practices. In-depth interviews were conducted with ten clinicians (eight female, two male) from diverse theoretical orientations. The data, which were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, revealed four key themes: "Supporting presence and getting to the heart of things quickly," "The relationship to the horse as the primary factor," "Going deeper, exploring further," and "The horse as a partner providing support, direction and dynamics." The findings highlight how the therapists described the presence of horses as fostering a strong therapeutic presence within a safe, authentic, and primarily nonverbal relationship. This frame was described as an "attachment laboratory" enhancing somatic awareness, and creating opportunities for exploration, experiential learning, and symbolic work. Importantly, therapists reported that working with horses not only benefited clients but also supported their own presence and abilities in therapy, as well as their professional satisfaction, offering a possible buffer against clinician burnout.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEquine-Assisted TherapyPsychotherapistsPsychotherapyAdultAnimalsFemaleHorsesHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAnimal-assisted therapyAttachmentCommon factorsEquine-assisted therapyPsychotherapy theoryPsychotherapy with horsesTherapeutic presenceTherapist perspectives

Identifiers

PMID41310576
PMCPMC12821812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.