ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Preferred practice patterns in the management of keratoconus: a national survey of cornea specialists in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKeratoconus is a progressive corneal disorder that often affects young individuals and can significantly impair visual function. Over the past two decades, diagnostic and therapeutic options have evolved rapidly, yet little is known about the current practice patterns of cornea specialists in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess the availability of diagnostic tools, treatment modalities, and preferred clinical practices in keratoconus management nationwide.
methodsA cross-sectional nationwide survey was conducted between April and May 2025 among cornea specialists in Saudi Arabia. A structured 26-item questionnaire was distributed electronically and included items related to demographics, diagnostic tools, surgical and nonsurgical treatment practices, and clinical decision-making. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings, and chi-square tests were applied to explore associations between selected variables.
resultsA total of 102 cornea specialists responded to the survey. The majority (93.1%) had completed a cornea subspecialty fellowship, and most (63.7%) practiced in governmental hospitals. Access to corneal cross-linking (CXL) was reported by 96.1% of participants. Scheimpflug-based imaging devices, particularly the Pentacam, were the most commonly used diagnostic tools (74.5%). Epi-off, accelerated CXL was the most preferred treatment protocol. DALK was the preferred surgical option for keratoplasty, with most surgeons favoring a hybrid technique starting with the big bubble approach. Scleral and RGP lenses were widely used, and indications for CXL extended beyond documented progression. No statistically significant associations were found between region, years of experience, or practice setting and the use of key treatment modalities.
conclusionCornea specialists in Saudi Arabia demonstrate high adherence to advanced and evidence-based practices in keratoconus management. Nonetheless, regional variations and lack of standardized protocols highlight the need for national guidelines to ensure consistent care across all settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.