Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310542›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Analyzing the health impact of substandard housing environment and access to water, sanitation and hygiene in India.

Meenakshi Priyadarshini, Haripriya Gundimeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meenakshi PriyadarshiniDepartment of Economics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India. meenakshi.iitb17@gmail.com.
Haripriya GundimedaDepartment of Economics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite ongoing policy efforts, the persistent prevalence of waterborne and vector-borne diseases in India highlights a critical gap in understanding the impact of inadequate access to and substandard quality of water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities, as well as poor housing conditions. This study addresses this gap by investigating the relationship between housing conditions, availability of WASH amenities, household behaviours, and the spread of diseases, focusing specifically on waterborne and vector-borne illnesses. The study explores both structural and environmental factors, as well as how hygiene practices contribute to disease transmission. Key areas of analysis include access to safely managed drinking water services, sanitation, hygiene practices, and maintaining a healthy living environment. The findings indicate that improved water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices and well-maintained living conditions significantly reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases. This study highlights the importance of integrating behavioural interventions with housing policies to enhance public health outcomes and mitigate disease risks in residential settings. The findings of this study highlight the urgent need to invest in health infrastructure, along with integrating WASH as part of housing policies and affordable and adequate housing definitions.

Indexed as

HousingHousing QualityHygieneSanitationWater SupplyHumansIndiaWaterborne DiseasesBehavioural risk factorsDisease transmissionHousehold behavioursHousing and healthWaterborne and vector-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID41310542
PMCPMC12659547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.