ArticleBMC public health2025
Capturing the wider benefits from football participation: a social return on investment (SROI) evaluation of a community based football intervention.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health follows football: a reflexive thematic analysis of culture, masculinity, and men's wellbeing in recreational football.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Developing an implementation strategy to scale a community-based football intervention for Men's health: an implementation science study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Football cooperative: a pragmatic controlled trial of a community-based physical activity social intervention for men when replicated using a Social Return on Investment (SROI) framework protocol paper.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGendered approaches to engage men are recommended for health promotion, with community settings, that involve physical activity and specifically football being frequently employed. One such football initiative, Football Cooperative (FC), has operated in Ireland since 2017 bringing men together twice a week for 'pick up' games. However, there is limited understanding of the reach or impact of the initiative, and an economic evaluation would inform policy decisions around the allocation of scarce resources within the public health and community-based setting.
methodsA localised version of cost-benefit analysis - Social Return on Investment (SROI) - was employed to assess this initiative. This involved a study of one site in 2021/2022 without a control group, and a range of data (self-reported and anthropometric) were collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. One hundred and twenty-three Participants (P) were available for this study, which also gathered data from other stakeholders, Significant Others (SO), Community Partners (CP) and Volunteer Coordinators (VC).
resultsOutcomes were validated with all stakeholders and measured by the stakeholders. Input costs were also gathered, and a comparison of outcomes with costs showed an SROI ratio of €17.60 in benefit for every €1 invested in the single FC site. Additional analysis exploring the implications of scaling this initiative to ten sites proposes an SROI ratio of €9.46 for every €1 invested.
conclusionsThe computed SROI ratios for a single site and for ten sites compare favourably with those of other health initiatives particularly other football and community based SROI evaluations. Furthermore, this study quantifies the benefits of football participation from a mental health and social perspective in addition to physical benefits, and it also highlights the benefits of football participation to other stakeholders such as participants' family (SO). Future research could expand on this study and investigate the impact of future football initiatives in diverse locations with larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.