ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
A four-year retrospective study on epidemiological updates of dermatophytosis in Kuwait.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dermatophytosis: An Update on Global Epidemiology.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatophytosis is a common superficial fungal infection caused by dermatophytes that infect keratinized tissues, including the skin, scalp, and nails. Dermatophytes are categorized into three groups: anthropophilic, zoophilic, and geophilic. In this study, we aimed to explore the recent epidemiology of dermatophytosis across Kuwait from January 2021 to December 2024. Data were collected from the Reference Mycology Laboratory in Kuwait, and a statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 10. A total of 214 dermatophyte isolates from 211 patients were obtained during the study period. The predominant dermatophytes isolated were zoophilic species, accounting for 127 (59%) cases, followed by 57 cases involving anthropophilic species (26.5%), 8 cases involving geophilic dermatophytes (4%), and 22 cases involving unidentified species (10.5%). The most frequently isolated dermatophyte was Trichophyton spp., with 132 cases identified (61.5%), followed by 73 cases involving Microsporum spp. (34%) and 8 cases involving Nannizzia spp. (4%). Epidermophyton spp. were rarely isolated, with only one case being found (0.5%). Seven cases of Trichophyton indotineae (3.3%) were also detected among all the Trichophyton spp. The most frequently affected age group was children under 10 years of age. Dermatophytosis was slightly more prevalent in males than in females. The abundance of zoophilic dermatophytes was greater than that of anthropophilic species. Furthermore, the appearance of T. indotineae cases in Kuwait highlights the need for antifungal stewardship in dermatology clinics, active surveillance of refractory recurrent cases, and optimized mycology diagnostic services in dermatology clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.