ArticleBMC public health2025
Unequal gains: evaluating Alabama's infant mortality reduction initiative by race and marital status.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveling the start: cost-effectiveness of community-based doula care among Medicaid birthsBMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfant mortality remains a critical public health concern in the United States, with disparities by race and maternal marital status. In response, Alabama implemented a pilot initiative in 2019 to reduce the state’s high infant mortality rate (IMR). This study evaluates the program’s effectiveness in mitigating IMR disparities across race and marital status.
methodsWe utilized linked birth and infant death certificate data from 2014 to 2023 to assess program impact. A difference-in-differences (DiD) design and synthetic control approach were applied to a sample of over 400,000 births, comparing two pilot counties (Montgomery and Macon) to the rest of Alabama. Outcomes were stratified by maternal race (Black, White) and marital status (married, single).
resultsCausal evidence from both the DiD and synthetic control analyses indicates that the program reduced IMR among White married mothers (–0.0016; –39.8%, p = 0.001). In contrast, Black married mothers experienced an increase in IMR (+ 0.0043; + 54.7%, p = 0.014) that was not statistically robust in DiD but confirmed by the synthetic control method, suggesting a likely causal adverse effect. No significant changes in IMR were detected for Black single (p = 0.862) or White single mothers (p = 0.777).
conclusionsThe pilot program produced improvements only for White married mothers. Disaggregated analysis revealed the necessity of jointly considering race and marital status to understand and address infant health inequities. PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to reduce IMR disparities must integrate both racial and social determinants—such as marital status. Resource allocation and program design should combine clinical services with broader social supports and prioritize the most vulnerable populations to effectively close persistent gaps in IMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.