Observational studyBMC gastroenterology2025
Esophageal cancer staging in Malawi: the feasibility of chest radiography and abdominal ultrasound for initial evaluation.
Observational study in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal cancer (EC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Malawi. Given limited imaging capacity and high costs, staging is not routinely performed. One proposed staging algorithm is to first evaluate for metastatic disease using low-cost chest radiography (CXR) and abdominal ultrasound (US) followed by confirmatory computerized tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen if no metastases identified on initial screening. The feasibility of this approach is unknown for EC in sub–Saharan Africa and was studied in the context of a larger prospective observational cohort study of EC in Malawi.
methodsFrom 2021 to 2022, EC patients at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi enrolled in the Treatment Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer in Malawi (TOEC-M) study were recruited. Participants were scheduled for a CXR, US, and CT scan as part of this sub-study. Participant characteristics, completion rates, imaging findings, and barriers to completion were documented. For participants undergoing all three imaging studies, sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
resultsOf 150 patients in TOEC-M, 67 (44.7%) enrolled in this sub-study. Mean age was 55.4 years and 50.8% were males. The majority had mid-esophageal (38 [56.7%]) squamous cell carcinomas (54 [80.6%]). CXR was completed in 54 (80.6%) study participants, US in 43 (64.2%), CT chest in 29 (43.3%), and CT abdomen in 24 (35.8%). Sixteen (23.9%) completed all studies and 4 (6.0%) did not undergo any imaging. Of the 63 patients that were imaged, metastatic disease was identified in 18 (28.6%) by any modality. Positive findings were identified on 3 (5.6%) CXRs, 4 (9.3%) US, and 18 (62.1%) CTs, most frequently liver masses followed by lung nodules and adenopathy. Barriers to imaging completion included participant functional status and scanner availability.
conclusionsAs access to EC treatment modalities expands, feasible and accurate staging will become increasingly important to guide clinical management. Our results suggest that CXR and US may serve as useful initial tools for assessing metastatic disease. In patients not medically fit for oncologic treatment, positive findings on CXR and US may allow CT to be deferred. Barriers to implementation of a pragmatic stepwise staging algorithm identified in this study can inform future research and care for patients with EC in similar resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.