ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Ecological niche modeling of two co-occurring desert species in Saudi Arabia: implications for biodiversity and climate resilience.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global biodiversity is facing unprecedented threats, partially due to climate change, with tropical and arid-zone species among the most vulnerable. In regions like Saudi Arabia, extreme temperatures and limited water availability amplify these risks, particularly for native desert flora. This study aimed to assess the current and future potential distributions of Ochradenus baccatus Delile and its co-occurring species Vachellia tortilis (Forssk.) Galasso & Banfi. Species occurrence data were compiled from field surveys, GBIF, and literature sources, and ecological niche models (ENMs) were developed using MaxEnt. A suite of bioclimatic, edaphic, topographic, and anthropogenic variables was used, and future projections were generated under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 climate scenarios. Variable selection was optimized through correlation analysis and Jackknife testing to ensure robust model performance. The MaxEnt models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with AUC values exceeding 0.90 for both species. Results indicated that temperature seasonality (bio4), minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio6), and precipitation variables (bio12, bio14) were key predictors influencing the distribution of both species. O. baccatus showed higher dependence on edaphic factors such as soil organic carbon and nitrogen, whereas V. tortilis exhibited broader ecological tolerance. High-suitability zones for both species were concentrated along the western mountainous escarpments, particularly in Al Madinah, Makkah, Al Bahah, and Asir. Future projections for the mid-century (2041-2060) and late-century (2061-2080) periods under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios revealed a substantial decline in suitable habitat area for O. baccatus and increasing fragmentation of co-occurrence zones. The species' high-suitability habitats are projected to shrink and shift toward east-central and northern regions. In contrast, V. tortilis is predicted to retain most of its range along the western escarpment but to experience moderate range contraction and northward redistribution. Consequently, shared high-suitability zones become increasingly isolated, particularly under high-emission scenarios. Hotspot analysis identified climatically stable regions along the southwestern highlands that may serve as future refugia. These areas represent priority zones for conservation planning, habitat restoration, and the establishment of climate-resilient management strategies to preserve Saudi Arabia's desert biodiversity under changing climatic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.