Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310440›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Wheat chloroplast pangenome reveals frequent intramolecular recombination in the inverted repeat regions.

Hua Zhang, Xuebing Qiu, Zhiliang Zhang, Jijin Zhang, You Qing, Yafei Guo, Xinyue Song, Chengzhi Liang, Yanling Sun, Yang Zhao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pan-chloroplast genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hua Zhang *Laboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuebing Qiu *Laboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiliang ZhangLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jijin ZhangLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
You QingLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yafei GuoLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinyue SongLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chengzhi LiangLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanling SunLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang ZhaoLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changbin YinLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jing WangLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fei LuLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. flu@genetics.ac.cn.
Mingsheng ChenLaboratory of Advanced Breeding Technologies, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. mschen@genetics.ac.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFF1000604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn eukaryotes, the mutation rate of the chloroplasts is lower than that of the nuclear genomes. Advances in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Third-Generation Sequencing (TGS) technologies, together with improvements in genome assembly algorithms, have substantially propelled research in chloroplast genomics. Although nearly 9,000 chloroplast genomes have been released, chloroplast population genetics for specific species remains unexplored. The chloroplast genome possesses a quadripartite structure consisting of a large single-copy (LSC) region, a small single-copy (SSC) region, and two inverted repeats (IRs). A longstanding question is why the maternally inherited chloroplast genome does not appear to suffer from the Muller’s ratchet effect. It has been hypothesized that intramolecular recombination within the chloroplast genome may counteract this effect; however, direct evidence for such recombination remains lacking.

resultsWe conducted chloroplast population data analysis in hexaploid wheat and its ancestral relatives. One the basis of the pan-genome constructed and phylogeny analysis of chloroplast genomes of all samples, we calculated the chloroplast diversity of hexaploid wheat (π = 0.0001) is the lowest among the three ploidy types tested. Additionally, we found that during the formation of hexaploid wheat, only the chloroplasts from tetraploid wheat were inherited. Moreover, Aegilops tauschii contributed solely as the paternal provider of nuclear genome material. In the chloroplast genome assembly, we assembled IRa (inverted repeat A) and IRb (inverted repeat B), revealing multiple insertion/deletion sequence differences between them. Importantly, we discovered that recombination occurs between the IR regions of the chloroplast genome. Frequent recombination results in two structural configurations existing in nearly equal proportions within a single sample. This phenomenon has led to an increase in the nucleotide diversity of the chloroplast IR region within the wheat population, which was originally low among species in Poaceae.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of assembling chloroplast genomes using low-depth whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and confirms that the chloroplast genome of hexaploid wheat originates from tetraploid wheat rather than Aegilops tauschii. Furthermore, we provide evidence of frequent intra-molecular recombination in the chloroplast IR regions, leading to the coexistence of two equimolar inversion isomers. Despite strong purifying selection, recombination increases genetic diversity within the IR regions, facilitating adaptation and maintaining the functional stability of essential genes. Our findings highlight the role of recombination in balancing genetic stability and flexibility in chloroplast genome evolution, offering new insights into nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions and polyploid adaptation.

Indexed as

ChloroplastsGenome, ChloroplastInverted Repeat SequencesRecombination, GeneticTriticumPhylogenyChloroplastInheritanceIntra-recombinationPan-genomeWheat

Identifiers

PMID41310440
PMCPMC12659086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.