Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310431›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025

Migraine management in Chinese headache centers: a national survey and the role of quality control inspections.

Ye Ran, Xiaolin Wang, Zizi He, Shengyuan Yu, Zhao Dong

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ye Ran *Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaolin Wang *Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zizi HeDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shengyuan YuDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. yusy1963@126.com.
Zhao DongDepartment of Neurology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. dong_zhaozhao@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA systematic quality control (QC) inspection system is very important to standardize migraine management. This study assesses the impact of the QC inspections on center operations, guideline adherence, and patient outcomes for an established national tiered headache care network in china, hoping to identify the key improvements that inform national care optimization strategies.

methodsA multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted in China. Lead physicians from 103 headache centers completed a structured electronic questionnaire covering headache consultation capacity, migraine treatment status, comorbidity and disability assessment, and comprehensive management. Centers were stratified by QC inspection status (29 inspected, 74 non-inspected), and outcomes were compared using nonparametric tests.

resultsCenters had a median of 4 [IQR: 3-5] headache specialists operating 4 [IQR: 2-6] half-day weekly headache clinics. Migraine accounted for 40% of the caseload, with chronic migraine and conventional acute drugs resistant migraine comprising approximately 40%. The most frequently recommended acute medications were rimegepant, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen; leading preventive medications included flunarizine, topiramate, and CGRP receptor antagonists. Non-pharmacological therapies were recommended by over 50% of specialists, yet patient uptake was less than 10%. QC-inspected centers operated significantly more clinic sessions per week (median 6 [4–8] vs. 3.5 [2–5] half-days, p = 0.0082), had higher rates of headache diary use (30% [20%–50%] vs. 20% [10%–40%], p = 0.0315), and demonstrated better follow-up rates for medication overuse headache (80% [50%–80%] vs. 50% [15%–80%], p = 0.0131) and higher rates of headache control (70% [50%–85%] vs. 60% [40%–80%], p = 0.0496). These centers also prescribed fewer Chinese patent medicines, and used more evidence-based preventive agents (e.g. galcanezumab, amitriptyline, p < 0.05), and conducted more continuing medical education sessions for physicians (median 5 [IQR: 4-10] vs. 3 [IQR: 2-5] per year, p = 0.0044).

conclusionHeadache centers in China generally provide guideline-adherent care for migraine cases, although access to specific therapies remains limited. QC inspections are associated with improved operational capacity, standardized management, and increased use of evidence-based treatments. Enhancing QC inspections, expanding access to advanced therapies, and strengthening physician and patient education are essential to further optimize China’s headache care network.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersChinaCross-Sectional StudiesGuideline AdherenceHumansQuality ControlSurveys and QuestionnairesHeadache centersMigraine managementQuality controlStandardized treatment

Identifiers

PMID41310431
PMCPMC12659503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.