Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310424›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025

Genetics of digital phenotypes of keel bone in layer chickens and correlations with keel bone fractures and deviations.

Moh Sallam, Lina Göransson, Anne Larsen, Helena Wall, Wael Alhamid, Stefan Gunnarsson, Martin Johnsson, Dirk-Jan de Koning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Moh SallamDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7023, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lina GöranssonDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 532 23, Skara, Sweden, Box 234.
Anne LarsenDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 532 23, Skara, Sweden, Box 234.
Helena WallDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 532 23, Skara, Sweden, Box 234.
Wael AlhamidDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7023, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan GunnarssonDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 532 23, Skara, Sweden, Box 234.
Martin JohnssonDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7023, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dirk-Jan de KoningDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7023, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. dj.de-koning@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6343-8155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoultry is a global industry with laying hens that are genetically optimized for high egg yield. Keel bone fractures can affect up to 80% of laying hens, posing welfare and production problems. Therefore, genetic selection to reduce keel fractures is important. However, the lack of a reliable, automated, and heritable phenotypes for keel bones makes this a challenging task. The aim of this study was to (1) develop automated analyses of radiographic images to phenotype keel bones, and (2) investigate whether the proposed phenotypes are heritable and genetically correlated with the post-dissection scores of keel bone fractures and deviations. A total of 1051 laying hens (Bovans Brown and Lohmann Brown) from a commercial farm were x-rayed, followed by keel bone dissection and scoring for deviations and fractures. Furthermore, blood was sampled for genotyping using 50 K Illumina SNP chips. Keel bones were segmented (with ~ 0.90 accuracy) from the radiographic images using deep learning models, after which the images were automatically measured for general geometry and radiopacity. Multi-trait genomic restricted maximum likelihood was used to estimate genetic parameters.

resultsHeritability estimates ranged from 0.28 to 0.30 for both keel deviations and fractures observed post-dissection. The automated phenotypes had heritability estimates ranging from 0.07 to 0.10 for keel radiopacity and from 0.11 to 0.39 for keel geometry. Estimates of genetic correlations of keel geometry with keel deviation and fractures ranged from -0.57 to 0.72.

conclusionsAutomated methods were developed for measuring keel bone radiopacity and geometry. Keel concave area was found to be a reliable and heritable phenotype that breeding companies can use to reduce keel deviations and fractures. These methods can also be adapted to measure other bones (e.g., tibiotarsal) or objects (e.g., eggs), allowing breeders to quickly compute phenotypes for keel, tibia, and egg size from the same radiographic image. The developed methods are well-suited for large-scale studies to assess different housing environments and nutrition strategies aimed at improving keel bone conditions.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesChickensFractures, BoneAnimalsFemaleGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRadiography

Identifiers

PMID41310424
PMCPMC12661725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.