ArticleScientific reports2025
Unveiling faking in job interviews by examining facial thermal cues in deception detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting deceptive information in job interviews is a major challenge for improving personnel selection validity. Traditional interviewer-based methods for detecting applicant faking are limited in accuracy, highlighting the need for reliable techniques to enhance detection and minimize suboptimal hiring decisions. This study aimed to (a) investigate functional infrared thermal imaging (fITI), a non-invasive method for measuring facial temperature, to determine whether cognitive load and arousal during direct deception induce facial thermal changes indicative of faking; and to (b) develop an automated framework for processing infrared recordings, accounting for head movements and physiognomic differences. A within-person experimental design was conducted with 27 participants in simulated job interviews under five conditions: baseline, rehearsed truth, rehearsed lie, spontaneous truth, and spontaneous lie. A high-sensitivity infrared camera recorded thermal changes on the nose, forehead, and cheeks. Our dynamic feature extraction approach enabled robust temporal analysis despite naturalistic head movements. Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant overall effect of faking; however, rehearsal and interaction effects were significant. Nasal temperature was higher in rehearsed than spontaneous responses and in spontaneous lies than spontaneous truths, while forehead and cheeks temperatures remained stable. Findings suggest that cognitive load from rehearsed and spontaneous questioning influences nasal thermal changes during faking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.