ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
Microelectrode arrays cultured with in vitro neural networks for motion control tasks: encoding and decoding progress and advances.
Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Modeling Alzheimer's disease with brain organoids: mechanisms, applications, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) cultured with in vitro neural networks are gaining prominence in bio-integrated system research, owing to their inherent plasticity and emergent learning behaviors. Here, recent advances in motion control tasks utilizing MEAs-based bio-integrated systems are presented, with a focus on encoding-decoding techniques. The bio-integrated system comprises MEAs integrated with neural networks, a bidirectional communication system, and an actuator. Classical decoding algorithms, such as firing-rate mapping and central firing-rate methods, along with cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, have been examined. These AI methods enhance the accuracy and adaptability of real-time, closed-loop motion control. A comparative analysis indicates that simpler, lower-complexity algorithms suit basic rapid-decision tasks, whereas deeper models exhibit greater potential in more complex temporal signal processing and dynamically changing environments. The review also systematically analyzes the prospects and challenges of bio-integrated systems for motion control. Future prospects suggest that MEAs cultured with in vitro neural networks may leverage their flexibility and low energy consumption to address diverse motion control scenarios, driving cross-disciplinary research at the intersection of neuroscience and artificial intelligence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.