Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Chemically tuned radiolabeling and membrane affinity in Drug-Functionalized carbon nanotube nanocarriers.

Sedigheh Abdollahi, Heidar Raissi, Farzaneh Farzad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sedigheh AbdollahiDepartment of chemistry, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
Heidar RaissiDepartment of chemistry, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran. hraeisi@birjand.ac.ir.
Farzaneh FarzadDepartment of chemistry, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiolabeled nanocarriers that can simultaneously deliver therapeutic and diagnostic agents are promising for targeted cancer therapy. In this study, we employed molecular dynamics and metadynamics simulations to investigate how the chemical identity of drug molecules influences the behavior of technetium-99 m (⁹⁹ᵐTc)-loaded carbon nanotube (CNT) nanocarriers at the atomic scale. Four clinically relevant drugs-methotrexate, diclofenac, ketotifen, and piroxicam-were conjugated to a single-walled CNT (SWCNT) via a bifunctional chelating group. Our results revealed that drug structure significantly affects radionuclide binding strength, molecular diffusion, and membrane affinity. The methotrexate-functionalized nanocarrier exhibited the most stable technetium coordination (- 825.80 kJ/mol), the lowest diffusion coefficient (0.0070 × 10⁻⁵ cm²/s), and the strongest interaction with a model phospholipid membrane (- 1376.02 kJ/mol). Free energy landscapes reconstructed from metadynamics simulations further confirmed the high thermodynamic stability of this configuration. These findings suggest that rational drug selection can effectively tune the physicochemical behavior of CNT-based radiopharmaceuticals, providing a mechanistic foundation for designing multifunctional nanocarriers with improved performance for nuclear imaging and site-specific drug delivery.

Indexed as

Lipid BilayersNanoparticle Drug Delivery SystemNanotubes, CarbonRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetiumHumansIsotope LabelingModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationLipid BilayersNanoparticle Drug Delivery SystemNanotubes, CarbonRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetiumBrachytherapyCarbon nanotubesMetadynamicsMolecular dynamicsRadiopharmaceutical nanocarriersTargeted drug deliveryTechnetium-99m

Identifiers

PMID41310331
PMCPMC12749000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.