ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025
Current management of chronic mesenteric ischemia: A comprehensive review.
Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Importance of Predicting Bowel Necrosis in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is an underdiagnosed condition characterized by post-prandial pain resulting from progressive mesenteric arterial stenosis. Although traditionally regarded as rare, contemporary evidence indicates a greater prevalence, particularly among elderly females. While multi-vessel involvement is considered classical, symptomatic single-vessel disease is increasingly recognized in the setting of inadequate collateral circulation. Diagnostic evaluation relies on a combination of imaging modalities including duplex ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and selective use of conventional angiography or functional studies in equivocal cases. Revascularization remains the cornerstone of definitive management. A paradigm shift toward endovascular-first strategies has occurred, driven by superior peri-operative safety, minimal invasiveness and shorter hospitalization. Endovascular therapy is indicated in most anatomically accessible lesions, especially ostial or short-segment stenoses of the celiac or superior mesenteric arteries. Covered stents are preferred in these settings due to enhanced patency. However, limitations include restenosis risk, technical failure in long-segment occlusions and contra-indications in extrinsic compression syndromes such as median arcuate ligament syndrome. Open surgical revascularization remains critical in patients with associated complex aortoiliac disease, long occlusions or failed endovascular attempts. Retrograde bypass from the iliac or infra-renal aorta is favored in high-risk patients for technical ease, while antegrade bypass from the supraceliac aorta may offer greater durability. Hybrid approaches such as retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS), indicated in cases where aortic clamping is not feasible and in acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia with bowel gangrene, offer high technical success and favorable mid-term outcomes. Early diagnosis and tailored revascularization strategies remain central to improving long-term clinical outcomes in CMI. Continued refinement of endovascular techniques and hybrid interventions holds promise for optimizing outcomes in anatomically and physiologically diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41310319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.