ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Personalized intensification of treatment for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the relationship between potential hepatotoxicity and novel hormonal therapies in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Individualized radiotherapy of bone metastases from prostate cancer: time trends and 5-year survival results.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, systemic therapy for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) was predicated on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. However, in the past decade, substantial improvements have been made by intensifying treatment based on a better understanding of the broad underlying biology of these cancers. The addition of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), docetaxel and/or radiotherapy to ADT is of proven benefit in certain patient subgroups, whereas AKT inhibitors, radioligand therapies and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are being evaluated in patients with metastatic HSPC. The clinical states of HSPC are determined by a history of localized prostate cancer versus presentation with de novo metastatic disease, as well as the extent of disease on conventional computed tomography imaging and whole-body bone scintigraphy. However, modern nuclear imaging modalities such as prostate-specific membrane antigen PET can visualize metastases below the limit of detection of computed tomography and whole-body bone scintigraphy; this earlier and more precise detection of metastases has identified new subgroups of patients for which certain treatment approaches, such as adding docetaxel to ADT plus an ARPI, might or might not apply. In this Review, we discuss the personalized management of both non-metastatic and metastatic HSPC, including how to select patients for docetaxel, choice of ARPI and use of radiotherapy to primary and metastatic disease sites. We also discuss emerging novel therapies and important principles of toxicity mitigation for HSPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41310272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.