ReviewObesity surgery2025
Metabolic Memory Following Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Strategies for Long-Term Success.
Review in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Adjuvant Treatment with Semaglutide After Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Class II-III Obesity: A Prospective Non-Randomized Controlled Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Remembrance of things past: Towards a life-course biology of aging.PLoS biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) treats severe obesity, but long-term benefits are often lost to weight regain and metabolic relapse driven by persistent molecular imprints. This narrative review synthesizes recent evidence and examines epigenetic, inflammatory, mitochondrial, and microbiota mechanisms underlying metabolic memory after MBS. Key imprints include altered adipose transcriptomes (e.g., lower IGF1 and GPX3), persistent NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and gut dysbiosis with variable, individual patterns. We highlight how these mechanisms drive clinical outcomes such as type 2 diabetes recurrence and residual cardiovascular risk, with tissue-specific epigenetic retention slowing renal and cardiac recovery. We evaluate evidence-based strategies to counteract or modulate metabolic memory. These include the strategic selection of bariatric procedure, preoperative metabolic optimization, Mediterranean diets rich in polyphenols, GLP-1/GIP co-agonists, senolytics (e.g., dasatinib + quercetin), and autologous fecal microbiome transplantation. Emerging preclinical approaches like CRISPR-dCas9 epigenetic editing and exploratory strategies like vagal neuromodulation show theoretical promise in targeting obesogenic memory pathways but remain far from clinical application. The review underscores the need for longitudinal multi-omics cohorts and metabolic memory biomarkers (e.g., PPARGC1A methylation, CCL25) to enable personalized interventions. By targeting metabolic memory proactively, MBS can evolve from weight-loss procedure to a durable reset of metabolic set points. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that many proposed strategies are derived from preliminary studies with limited sample sizes and follow-up, necessitating further validation in large-scale trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41310268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.