Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310261›Full record

ReviewTransgenic research2025

Advancements in genomic crop techniques and considerations for regulation and food safety.

Gijs W Spaans, Jan Pieter van der Berg, Lianne M S Bouwman, Gijs A Kleter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transgenic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. What´s in a name: the issue with regulatory definitions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gijs W SpaansWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6032-667X
Jan Pieter van der BergWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-2240
Lianne M S BouwmanWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7881-554X
Gijs A KleterWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. gijs.kleter@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-1149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in genomic crop techniques have led to the development of new genetic technologies, such as base- and prime editing, but improvements have been made to existing conventional techniques as well. Fields in which these advancements occur include targeted mutagenesis, conventional random mutagenesis, and developments with null segregants, e.g., crops from which transgenic elements have been crossed out. In this review, we describe the developments in these three fields and provide considerations concerning regulatory and safety aspects. Because of differences in legislation of modern biotechnology between countries or regions, regulatory challenges are to be expected given the ongoing developments in genomic crop techniques. Moreover, the nature of the mutations induced with these newly developed techniques is not different from those induced with conventional techniques, making the modified crop plants indistinguishable from non-modified counterparts of the same crop species. Thus, enforcement of regulations cannot solely rely on technical analytical methods. Also, potential off-target or unintended effects in the primary mutants remain underexplored. Yet, these do not raise safety concerns owing to the experience with the crop breeding practice of iterative cycles for desirable traits selection, as well as the segregation and discard of unwanted phenotypes. Given that regulation will always change after innovation and developments within the sector advance rapidly, we advocate that both authorities and the breeding sector pro-actively implement a food safety culture. Such a safety culture will help developers of genomic technologies in crops to identify potential food safety issues at an early stage of development of future products.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalFood SafetyGenomicsPlants, Genetically ModifiedFood, Genetically ModifiedGene EditingGenome, PlantHumansMutagenesisPlant BreedingCRISPR-CasGenome editingNew genomic techniquesTALENsTILLINGTransposons

Identifiers

PMID41310261
PMCPMC12660440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.