Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310217›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Synergistic inhibition of CHK1 and MUS81 to combat replication stress resistance in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Elien Hilgert, Christophe Van Neste, Sarah-Lee Bekaert, Fien Martens, Suzanne Vanhauwaert, Ellen Sanders, Peter Verstraelen, Martijn Risseeuw, Ellen M Westerhout, Mark A Grannetia and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Elien HilgertDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Christophe Van NesteDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Sarah-Lee BekaertDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Fien MartensDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Suzanne VanhauwaertDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Ellen SandersDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Peter VerstraelenLaboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Martijn RisseeuwLaboratory for Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Ellen M WesterhoutOncogenetics & Oncogenomics, Department of Human Genetics, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark A GrannetiaOncogenetics & Oncogenomics, Department of Human Genetics, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Serge Van CalenberghLaboratory for Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Nadine Van RoyDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Winnok H De VosLaboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Rob W F WolthuisOncogenetics & Oncogenomics, Department of Human Genetics, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank SpelemanDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Lisa DepestelDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Kaat DurinckDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium. kaat.durinck@ugent.be.

Funding

Antwerp University Special Research Fund BOF N°52006Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11C3921NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12N6917NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12U4718NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G087221NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek I003420NGhent University Special Research Fund BOF.GOA.2022.0003.03Stichting Villa Joep N°23: "Identification and functional analysis of replicative stress resistors as novel therapeutic targets in neuroblastomaStichting Villa Joep N°23: "Identification and functional analysis of replicative stress resistors as novel therapeutic targets in neuroblastoma"Stichting Villa Joep N°33 "Tailored Combination Therapies to Target the Multiple Faces of Neuroblastoma"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk neuroblastoma is a pediatric tumor that originates from immature sympathetic neuroblasts and is characterized by a low mutational burden. Nevertheless, it frequently presents with highly recurrent chromosomal imbalances, including MYCN amplification and gain of chromosome 17q. Highly proliferative cancers, such as neuroblastoma, exhibit significant DNA replication stress, rendering tumor cells dependent on ATR-CHK1 signalling and DNA damage repair pathways. We previously hypothesized that gene dosage effects resulting from 17q copy number alterations of non-mutated genes involved in replication stress resistance could offer novel therapeutic opportunities. To identify critical candidate genes and pathways driving high-risk neuroblastoma, we performed an integrated bioinformatics analysis, and identified the BRIP1 gene, encoding the FANCJ protein, as top-ranked 17q candidate. FANCJ is involved in multiple processes that alleviate replication stress. In the absence of specific FANCJ-targeting compounds, we evaluated the phenotypic and molecular effects of pharmacological inhibition of the MUS81 endonuclease, which functions downstream of FANCJ in restarting stalled replication forks. When combined with CHK1 inhibition, we observed synergistic effects on neuroblastoma cell growth and survival, supporting further development of on-target MUS81 inhibitors for in vivo preclinical testing and future clinical trials aimed at overcoming replication stress resistance in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Indexed as

Checkpoint Kinase 1DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationEndonucleasesNeuroblastomaCell Line, TumorDNA DamageFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsHumansCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsMUS81 protein, human17q gainCombination therapyFANCJMUS81NeuroblastomaReplication stress

Identifiers

PMID41310217
PMCPMC12749815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.