ArticleScientific reports2025
Intimate partner violence and relationship quality among pregnant women: insights from a multi-centre study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate partner violence presents a complex dilemma that significantly impacts the well-being of women, particularly during pregnancy. This issue often arises from a dysfunctional relationship, characterised by inadequate emotional connections and poor-quality interactions between partners. The study identifies the interaction of intimate partner violence and the quality of the relationship between partners. A multi-centred, descriptive cross-sectional hospital-based study, in which 460 consenting pregnant women attending antenatal and postnatal care at the respective health facilities in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, General Hospital Ifako Ijaye, Primary Health centre Onigbogbo and were consecutively recruited over a six-month period An adapted questionnaire from the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence and Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) to measure the quality of marital relationships. Behavioural violence was the most commonly reported, affecting 16.1% of respondents. Psychological violence was experienced by 12.9% of the participants, while 5.3% reported physical violence. Economic and sexual violence were reported by 4.6% and 4.3% of participants, respectively. Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS), which includes cohesion, consensus, and satisfaction components. Cohesion, 55.2% of participants had high scores, 26.1% scored in the mid-range, and 18.7% were classified as low. Regarding consensus, 73.6% of respondents were in the high range, 17.5% in the mid-range, and 8.9% in the low range. For satisfaction, 79.6% of respondents reported high satisfaction, while 13.7% and 6.7% fell into the mid and low satisfaction categories, respectively. Religion, education level, and experiences of sexual, physical, and psychological violence show strong associations with distress in pregnant women. These insights emphasize the complex intersection of sociocultural context and intimate partner dynamics, particularly during vulnerable periods like pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.