ArticleCommunications engineering2025
An autonomous drone swarm for detecting and tracking anomalies among dense vegetation.
Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Swarms of drones offer increased sensing aperture. When these swarms mimic natural behaviors, sampling is enhanced by adapting the aperture to local conditions. We demonstrate that this enables detection and tracking of heavily occluded targets. Object classification in conventional aerial images generalizes poorly due to occlusion randomness and is inefficient even under minimal occlusion. In contrast, anomaly detection applied to synthetic-aperture integral images remains robust in dense vegetation and independent of pre-trained classes. Our autonomous, centralized swarm searches for unknown or unexpected occurrences, tracking them while continuously adapting its sampling pattern to optimize local viewing conditions. We achieved average positional accuracies of 0.39 m with average precisions of 93.2% and average recalls of 95.9%. Here, adapted particle swarm optimization considers detection confidences and predicted target appearance. We present a new confidence metric that identifies the most abnormal targets and show that sensor noise can be effectively included in the synthetic aperture process, removing the need for costly optimization of high-dimensional parameter spaces. Finally, we provide a hardware-software framework enabling low-latency transmission and fast processing of video and telemetry data. Although our field experiments involved six drones, ongoing technological advances will soon enable larger, faster swarms for military and civil applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.