ArticleScientific reports2025
Omega deoxyribonucleic acid cryptography key-based authentication.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deoxyribonucleic acid cryptography is a biologically inspired approach characterized by low computational complexity. It employs biological principles to create cryptographically strong ciphers, making it particularly suitable for protecting sensitive data on resource-constraints devices. However, the existing literature lacks solutions for securing authentication mechanisms tailored for these resource-constrained devices. To bridge this gap, the current study proposes a novel authentication design rooted in deoxyribonucleic acid cryptography, namely omega deoxyribonucleic acid cryptography key-based authentication. The proposed omega deoxyribonucleic acid cryptography-based authentication method aligns with contemporary standards for cryptographic systems and delivers a security level quantified at 256 bits of complexity. To validate its resilience, one tests the collision resistance of the proposed authentication mechanism using the standard Dieharder statistical test suite, where the mechanism successfully passes the collision resistance test. Additionally, the proposed scheme is mathematically proven secure against existential forgery under a chosen message attack.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.