Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310187›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

A clinically validated AI framework for kidney cancer detection and characterization.

Bohdan Petryshak, Mikhail Iljin, Alina Denissova, Joonas Ariva, Toomas Häide, Veljo Lasn, Martin Reim, Ihor Ivaniv, Toomas Lillsaar, Hardi Vilt and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Bohdan PetryshakInstitute of Computer Science, Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia.
Mikhail IljinBetter Medicine OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Alina DenissovaBetter Medicine OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Joonas ArivaInstitute of Computer Science, Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia.
Toomas HäideBetter Medicine OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Veljo LasnBetter Medicine OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Martin ReimBetter Medicine OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Ihor IvanivBetter Medicine OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Toomas LillsaarTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Hardi ViltTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Anu LehtTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Anti KaraskTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Gitana KiudmaTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Rait KäppTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Priit SalumaaBetter Medicine OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Pilvi IlvesTartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Dmytro FishmanInstitute of Computer Science, Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia. dmytro.fishman@bettermedicine.ai.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4644-8893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal cell carcinoma is one of the most common cancers of the urinary tract and is usually diagnosed by interpreting contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans. Rising demand for radiological services, combined with a shortage of radiologists, makes timely and accurate diagnosis increasingly challenging. Automated approaches may help radiologists improve efficiency and accuracy.

methodsWe developed BMVision, a deep learning-based tool for detecting and characterizing kidney cancer. The tool integrates with a web-based viewer designed to provide an intuitive interface for radiologists. Its performance was evaluated in a two-stage retrospective reader study. Six radiologists independently reviewed 200 scans across both AI-assisted and unaided workflows, allowing comparison of diagnostic performance and workflow efficiency with and without support from the tool. Statistical analysis compared AI-aided and unaided workflows across predefined clinical criteria, including diagnostic sensitivity, lesion measurement, reporting efficiency, and inter-radiologist agreement, using non-parametric tests and bootstrapping.

resultsHere we show that BMVision reduces radiologists' reporting time by an average of 33%, up to 52%. The tool provides structured auto-generated reports, minimizing the need for manual dictation or typing. In addition, BMVision improves sensitivity for detecting benign renal lesions (from 79.9 to 86.3%) and leads to a significant increase in inter-radiologist agreement.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, BMVision is the first clinically validated commercial artificial intelligence tool for kidney cancer detection and characterization. By improving diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency, it has the potential to enhance patient care and help radiologists meet the growing demand for high-quality cancer diagnostics.

Identifiers

PMID41310187
PMCPMC12749715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.