ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of toxicity and mechanisms of aspartame in kidney stones with network toxicology and molecular docking strategy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pioglitazone Mitigates Arsenic-Induced Cardiotoxicity via Lipid Metabolism: Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Approach.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
- The effects of nicotine exposure on depression: An integrative analysis combining network toxicology, molecular docking, and Mendelian randomization.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- An integrative pharmacovigilance, network toxicology and molecular docking study on drug-induced cheilitis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aspartame, an artificial sweetener, has been implicated in the formation of kidney stones, although the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aims to analyze the toxicity of aspartame on kidney stone development using network toxicology and molecular docking strategies. We used ChEMBL, SwissTargetPrediction, and STITCH databases to identify 145 unique targets of aspartame action, and GeneCards and OMIM databases to identify 776 unique targets related to kidney stones. Integration of these datasets revealed 19 common targets for aspartame-induced kidney stones. A Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network was constructed utilizing the STRING database, and the topological properties of this network were evaluated using Cytoscape software. This analysis revealed five key targets: ACE, IL1B, REN, CASP3, and NOS3. To further understand the biological significance of these targets, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were conducted using the DAVID database. The results indicated that core targets are primarily involved in endocrine processes, endopeptidase activity, and aspartic-type endopeptidase activity. Notably, signaling pathways such as the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) demonstrated significant associations with aspartame-related toxicity. Molecular docking analysis using Autodock Vina revealed a positive affinity between the proteins and aspartame. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations revealed stable interactions and optimized binding conformations for all targets, suggesting significant roles for specific residues like GLU384 in ACE, ARG341 in CASP3, ARG183 in NOS3, and ARG98 in IL1B. This study successfully identifies and characterizes the key molecular targets and pathways associated with aspartame-induced kidney stones, providing a foundational understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms. Additional experiments are necessary to verify these findings and explore therapeutic approaches targeting these pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.