ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Fair positive unlabeled learning for predicting undiagnosed Alzheimer's disease in diverse electronic health records.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive cascading artificial intelligence for Alzheimer's disease assessment: a clinically oriented narrative review and implementation framework.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological conditions: a narrative review.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in dementia care: challenges, controversies, and policy implications.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's Disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disease, is underdiagnosed and more prominent in underrepresented groups. We performed semi-supervised positive unlabeled learning (SSPUL) coupled with racial bias mitigation for equitable prediction of undiagnosed AD from diverse populations at UCLA Health using electronic health records. SSPUL achieved superior sensitivity (0.77-0.81) and area under the precision recall curve (AUCPR) (0.81-0.87) across non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic African American, Hispanic Latino, and East Asian groups compared to supervised baseline models (sensitivity: 0.39-0.53; AUCPR: 0.3-0.7). SSPUL also exhibited superior fairness as evidenced by the lowest cumulative parity loss. We identified top shared and distinct features among labeled and unlabeled AD patients, including those that are neurological (e.g., memory loss) and non-neurological (e.g., decubitus ulcer). We validated our results using polygenic risk scores, which were higher in labeled and predicted positives than in predicted negatives among non-Hispanic white, Hispanic Latino, and East Asian groups (p < 0.001).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.