Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310153›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Uncertainty-weighted semi-supervised learning with dynamic entropy masking and Bhattacharyya-regularized loss.

Mohammed Talal Ghazal, Jafar Tanha, Nasrin Shahi, SeyedEhsan Roshan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed Talal GhazalDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Jafar TanhaDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. tanha@tabrizu.ac.ir.
Nasrin ShahiDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
SeyedEhsan RoshanDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) leverages labeled and unlabeled data for modern classification tasks. However, existing SSL approaches often underutilize moderately uncertain samples and may propagate errors from highly uncertain pseudo-labels, leading to suboptimal performance, in noisy and class-imbalanced datasets. We introduce an SSL framework with an uncertainty-weighted training mechanism that prioritizes moderately uncertain samples while deferring extremely uncertain samples via a dynamic entropy mask. Training on unlabeled data combines masked cross-entropy with a Bhattacharyya-regularized alignment term between weak and strong predictions, improving view consistency and distribution alignment. A dynamic entropy threshold ([Formula: see text]) that adapts over training, filtering only extremely uncertain pseudo-labels and thereby limiting error propagation while retaining informative unlabeled data. The proposed framework is evaluated on several benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, SVHN and STL-10 under label-scarce and class-imbalanced protocols, achieving up to 3-5% absolute accuracy gains over strong SSL baselines (e.g., FixMatch, ReMixMatch, FreeMatch). Our results show that the proposed approach improves model generalization and robustness, particularly in scenarios involving label noise, class imbalance, and limited labeled data, while remaining comparable on clean, class-balanced settings.

Indexed as

Bhattacharyya-Regularized divergenceDynamic maskingPseudo-labelsSemi-supervised learningUncertainty-weighted training

Identifiers

PMID41310153
PMCPMC12748890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.