Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Response Inhibition in borderline personality disorder assessed with a gamified stop signal task.

Nadine Barakat, Martin Dechant, Emmanuel Poulet, Lionel Cailhol, Jérôme Brunelin, Maximilian A Friehs, Cécilia Neige

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadine BarakatLe Vinatier, Psychiatrie Universitaire Lyon Métropole, Bron, 69500, France.
Martin DechantDepartment of Clinical Educational Health Psychology (CEHP), University College London, London, UK.
Emmanuel PouletLe Vinatier, Psychiatrie Universitaire Lyon Métropole, Bron, 69500, France.
Lionel CailholDepartment of Psychiatry and Addiction, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Jérôme BrunelinLe Vinatier, Psychiatrie Universitaire Lyon Métropole, Bron, 69500, France.
Maximilian A FriehsPsychology of Conflict Risk and Safety, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Cécilia NeigeLe Vinatier, Psychiatrie Universitaire Lyon Métropole, Bron, 69500, France. cecilia.neige@inserm.fr.

Funding

Le Vinatier-PULM #PRVP07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by pervasive difficulties with self-image, interpersonal relationships, emotion regulation and impulse control. Impulsive behaviors can be assessed using tasks such as the stop-signal task (SST). Traditional SSTs are repetitive and cognitively demanding, requiring sustained attention and effort over extended periods. This can be challenging, particularly for clinical populations who often experience difficulties with attention, emotional regulation, and frustration tolerance. In this study, we examined whether a gamified version of the SST (gSST) could effectively differentiate inhibitory control in patients with BPD compared to healthy controls (HC), and explored associations between behavioral performance and self-reported impulsivity. Fifty participants (25 BPD, 25 HC) completed the gSST and the UPPS-P impulsivity questionnaire. Patients with BPD showed significantly faster reaction times, more choice errors, and shorter stop-signal delays, indicating impairments in proactive inhibition. Evidence for reactive inhibition deficits was, however, inconclusive, as no significant group difference emerged for the primary measure, the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT). The SSRT correlated positively with self-reported positive urgency across the sample, suggesting a link between emotionally driven impulsivity and inhibitory control as assessed with a gSST. These findings highlight the potential of gamified cognitive tasks to provide sensitive, engaging, and ecologically valid measures of impulsivity, with implications for both clinical assessment and personalized intervention strategies in BPD.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderInhibition, PsychologicalAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultGamificationImpulsivityMotor controlResponse inhibition

Identifiers

PMID41310124
PMCPMC12749117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.