ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of factors affecting the academic performance of university students using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interdisciplinary integration in public health emergency education: learning outcomes following a curriculum reform for preventive medicine undergraduates.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the determinants of university students' academic performance has become a strategic priority for higher education institutions, especially in contexts marked by social, economic, and academic diversity. However, performance assessment remains a challenge due to the complexity of the educational process and the nonlinear nature of learning behaviors. A machine learning-based prediction model was developed using primary data from 386 university students. The performance of nine educational data mining (EDM) algorithms, including XGBoost, Random Forest, artificial neural networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machines, Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, AdaBoost, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), was evaluated using demographic, socioeconomic, academic, social and family, health and wellness, infrastructure and services, and time management and extracurricular activity factors. The results reveal that machine learning is an effective tool for representing nonlinear relationships between academic performance and its determinants, allowing for accurate prediction of academic outcomes and explaining the individual contribution of each variable through sensitivity and interpretability analyses. Despite differences in their predictive accuracy, all algorithms effectively modeled educational dynamics. In particular, those models that integrate multiple student dimensions demonstrated better generalization capabilities. It is concluded that, to achieve an accurate assessment of academic performance in diverse university environments, it is essential to consider influencing factors in machine learning-based predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.