Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310110›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

SmartERD: a pipeline for referencing subjects to a common peak in the analysis of ERD dynamics.

Sara Spadone, Carlo Sestieri, Paolo Capotosto, Antonello Baldassarre, Stefano L Sensi, Stefania Della Penna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara SpadoneUniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Carlo SestieriDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, Chieti, 66100, Italy.
Paolo CapotostoDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, Chieti, 66100, Italy.
Antonello BaldassarreDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, Chieti, 66100, Italy.
Stefano L SensiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, Chieti, 66100, Italy.
Stefania Della PennaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, Chieti, 66100, Italy. stefania.dellapenna@unich.it.

Funding

Fundação Bial #159-2016HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council 828784Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca Departments of Excellence 2023-2027 - CUP: D57G22000370001NextGenerationEU ECS00000041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying band-specific features -such as amplitude and latency/duration-from event-related desynchronization (ERD) patterns in MEG/EEG time-frequency representations can enhance our understanding of how the brain processes tasks and influences behavior. However, these features can be affected by potential noise, intrinsic instabilities, and inter-trial variability, which makes it challenging to analyze ERD dynamics accurately when multiple peaks with similar amplitudes emerge in the ERD pattern. To address these issues, we introduce SmartERD, a new pipeline designed to extract dynamic ERD features while considering ERD variability. SmartERD automatically estimates a band-specific pseudo-confidence interval around the absolute ERD peak, inspired by uncertainty propagation principles. It then identifies the first local ERD peak within this interval -representing the first component of the induced oscillatory response- and automatically extracts its features. A key advantage of this approach is that it extracts the latency of a common reference point for all subjects -the first peak response after a trigger- facilitating more consistent comparisons. We validated SmartERD through realistic simulations that mimic different trial numbers. Results showed that SmartERD's estimates are closer to the ground truth across various noise levels compared to standard methods. Additionally, when applied to experimental MEG data, SmartERD demonstrated a better ability to capture individual differences in ERD dynamics, thanks to the selection of a common reference latency. Overall, we propose SmartERD as a valuable tool for extracting meaningful features from oscillatory dynamics, with the potential to improve the analysis of brain-behavior relationships in complex cognitive tasks.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyMagnetoencephalographyAdultAlgorithmsHumansMaleERD dynamicsFeature extractionIndividual variabilityMagnetoencephalographyTFR varianceTime-frequency analysis

Identifiers

PMID41310110
PMCPMC12748784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.