ArticleScientific reports2025
SmartERD: a pipeline for referencing subjects to a common peak in the analysis of ERD dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying band-specific features -such as amplitude and latency/duration-from event-related desynchronization (ERD) patterns in MEG/EEG time-frequency representations can enhance our understanding of how the brain processes tasks and influences behavior. However, these features can be affected by potential noise, intrinsic instabilities, and inter-trial variability, which makes it challenging to analyze ERD dynamics accurately when multiple peaks with similar amplitudes emerge in the ERD pattern. To address these issues, we introduce SmartERD, a new pipeline designed to extract dynamic ERD features while considering ERD variability. SmartERD automatically estimates a band-specific pseudo-confidence interval around the absolute ERD peak, inspired by uncertainty propagation principles. It then identifies the first local ERD peak within this interval -representing the first component of the induced oscillatory response- and automatically extracts its features. A key advantage of this approach is that it extracts the latency of a common reference point for all subjects -the first peak response after a trigger- facilitating more consistent comparisons. We validated SmartERD through realistic simulations that mimic different trial numbers. Results showed that SmartERD's estimates are closer to the ground truth across various noise levels compared to standard methods. Additionally, when applied to experimental MEG data, SmartERD demonstrated a better ability to capture individual differences in ERD dynamics, thanks to the selection of a common reference latency. Overall, we propose SmartERD as a valuable tool for extracting meaningful features from oscillatory dynamics, with the potential to improve the analysis of brain-behavior relationships in complex cognitive tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.