ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent recognition of counterfeit goods text based on BERT and multimodal feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Counterfeit goods are often imitated through the similarity of pronunciation or character shape of the trade name, for example, '' is altered to '', and this text-level imitation means brings great trouble to consumer identification. However, there is a scarcity of research on intelligent recognition techniques for this phenomenon. Although the Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) technique provides some ideas for solving this problem, it still faces the challenges of scarce datasets, significant interference of erroneous characters with the contextual semantics, and high confusion between erroneous characters and correct characters in terms of pronunciation or glyphs in practical applications. In view of the above problems, this paper proposed a Corrector-Detector Auxiliary Network named CDANet. Specifically, (i) A lightweight Transformer Block is used to assist in locating erroneous characters to reduce their interference with contextual semantics; (ii) The multimodal information of erroneous characters is deeply exploited by integrating glyph, pinyin, and semantic features to enhance the correction accuracy; (iii) A counterfeit goods text dataset (CGT-Dataset) containing 289,851 samples was constructed to alleviate the problem of data scarcity. The experimental results show that CDANet achieves the current optimal performance on the self-built CGT-Dataset and exhibits excellent generalization ability on three public benchmark datasets, providing an efficient solution for counterfeit goods text recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.