ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance enhancement of a low-energy humidification dehumidification desalination system using the M-cycle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water scarcity remains a pressing global issue, particularly in arid and coastal regions, necessitating the development of energy-efficient and sustainable desalination technologies. This study presents a novel humidification-dehumidification desalination system enhanced by the M-Cycle, which utilizes ambient thermal energy to minimize power consumption and eliminate reliance on fossil fuels. A coupled computational approach involving CFD simulations and PSO was employed to model and optimize system performance. The CFD analysis captured detailed temperature and humidity distributions across the heat and mass exchanger, while the PSO algorithm optimized three key parameters: air velocity, heat exchanger width, and dry air split ratio. Notably, the optimized configuration-an airflow velocity of 6.89 m/s, a device width of 0.63 m, and a 35.97% dry air split-resulted in a freshwater production rate of 3.04 kg per kWh of electricity consumed, 360.5 L per day, and an outlet relative humidity of 99%, with total power consumption of 4.94 kW. Compared to previous M-Cycle-based desalination systems, the proposed configuration demonstrates over a threefold improvement in energy efficiency, as measured by the GOR, highlighting its superior thermodynamic performance. Additionally, the study uniquely resolved the spatial distribution of relative humidity and evaporation rates, without relying on simplifications such as assuming saturated air at the outlet. The results confirm the potential of the proposed M-Cycle HDH system as a highly efficient, scalable, and eco-friendly desalination technology suitable for decentralized and off-grid applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.