ArticleCommunications engineering2025
Cognitive embodied learning for anomaly active target tracking.
Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary challenge in active object tracking (AOT) lies in maintaining robust and accurate tracking performance in the complex physical scenarios. Existing end-to-end frameworks based on deep learning and reinforcement learning often struggle with high computational costs, data dependency, and limited generalization, hindering their performance in practical applications. Although embodied intelligence (EI) is promising to enable agents to learn from physical interactions, it cannot tackle severe anomalies happened in the complex scenarios. In order to address this issue, here we propose a novel embodied learning method, called the Cognitive Embodied Learning (CEL), which is inspired by the dual decision-making system of the human brain. The CEL can dynamically switch between normal tracking and anomaly handling modes, supported by specialized modules including the anomaly cognition module, the rule reasoning module, and the anomaly elimination module. Moreover, we further introduce the categorical objective function to address function non-measurability and data confusion caused by severe anomalies. Extensive unmanned aerial vehicle anomaly active target tracking experiments in both simulated and real-world scenarios demonstrate the superior performance of our method. Compared to the state-of-the-art methods, the CEL achieves a 361.4% increase in the success rate and a 54.4% improvement of the task completion efficiency, which highlights the potential of CEL to advance the field of AOT and open new avenues for more robust and intelligent tracking systems in the challenging environments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.