ArticleScientific reports2025
Modifier guided resilient CNN inference enables fault-tolerant edge collaboration for IoT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In resource-constrained Internet of Things (IoT) scenarios, implementing robust and accurate deep learning inference is problematic due to device failures, limited computing power, and privacy concerns. We present a resilient, completely edge-based distributed convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture that eliminates cloud dependencies while enabling accurate and fault-tolerant inference. At its core is a lightweight Modifier Module deployed at the edge, which synthesizes predictions for failing devices by pooling peer CNN outputs and weights. This dynamic mechanism is trained via a novel fail-simulation technique, allowing it to mimic missing outputs in real-time without model duplication or cloud fallback. We assess our methodology using MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets under both homogeneous and heterogeneous data partitions, with up to five simultaneous device failures. The system displays up to 1.5% absolute accuracy improvement, 30% error rate reduction, and stable operation even with over 80% device dropout, exceeding ensemble, dropout, and federated baselines. Our strategy combines significant statistical significance, low resource utilization (~ 15 KB per model), and real-time responsiveness, making it well-suited for safety-critical IoT installations where cloud access is infeasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.