ArticleScientific reports2025
Analytical multi-body approach for component selection and timing analysis in spring-actuated vacuum circuit breakers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A vacuum circuit breaker (VCB) operates with a mechanical mechanism that ensures rapid arc quenching, reliable protection, and current interruption in high-voltage electrical systems. Over the past few decades, numerous engineering teams and researchers have explored this issue. However, despite the importance of precise timing in VCBs, no analytical method currently exists to investigate the dynamic response of their mechanical mechanisms. Existing approaches rely heavily on numerical simulations or experimental testing, which are often time-consuming, computationally expensive, and impractical for extensive parametric studies. In this study, the time response of a VCB case study is investigated through multi-body dynamic analysis for both opening and closing conditions. Additionally, the optimal spring characteristics of the mechanism are explored, and a SolidWorks model of a manufactured VCB was created as a case study to achieve this objective. The angular relationships of the mechanism's links were analyzed for both opening and closing actions. From these relationships, angular velocities were derived and incorporated into work-energy equations and boundary conditions from the SolidWorks model to determine the mechanism's time response. The results indicate an opening time of 39.9 ms and a closing time of 60.5 ms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.