Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310043›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analytical multi-body approach for component selection and timing analysis in spring-actuated vacuum circuit breakers.

Amir Arsalan Baniasadi, Hossein Darijani, Mahmood Matin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amir Arsalan BaniasadiMechanical Engineering Department, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Hossein DarijaniMechanical Engineering Department, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. darijani@uk.ac.ir.
Mahmood MatinMechanical Engineering Department, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vacuum circuit breaker (VCB) operates with a mechanical mechanism that ensures rapid arc quenching, reliable protection, and current interruption in high-voltage electrical systems. Over the past few decades, numerous engineering teams and researchers have explored this issue. However, despite the importance of precise timing in VCBs, no analytical method currently exists to investigate the dynamic response of their mechanical mechanisms. Existing approaches rely heavily on numerical simulations or experimental testing, which are often time-consuming, computationally expensive, and impractical for extensive parametric studies. In this study, the time response of a VCB case study is investigated through multi-body dynamic analysis for both opening and closing conditions. Additionally, the optimal spring characteristics of the mechanism are explored, and a SolidWorks model of a manufactured VCB was created as a case study to achieve this objective. The angular relationships of the mechanism's links were analyzed for both opening and closing actions. From these relationships, angular velocities were derived and incorporated into work-energy equations and boundary conditions from the SolidWorks model to determine the mechanism's time response. The results indicate an opening time of 39.9 ms and a closing time of 60.5 ms.

Indexed as

Closing timeMedium voltage vacuum circuit breakerOpening timeSpring effectsTheoretical multibody dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41310043
PMCPMC12660897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.