Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310038›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Meta-analysis reveals the effect of biochar on sulfonamides and tetracyclines in soil.

Wendan Xia, Yueting Liu, Mingbo Tang, Dishen Li, Guohui Zhang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wendan XiaSchool of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Yueting LiuSchool of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Mingbo TangSchool of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Dishen LiSchool of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China.
Guohui ZhangSchool of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang, 110036, China. 860002055@qq.com.

Funding

INNOVATION CHINA kjhx2021063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfonamides (SAs) and tetracyclines (TCs) are widely used as broad-spectrum antibiotics, raising global concern due to their potential to accumulate in soil and consequent impact on the ecosystem. Although biochar has the ability to reduce SAs and TCs in soil, the understanding of the factors affecting the efficacy of biochar remediation remains inadequate. Here, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of biochar on SAs and TCs concentrations, soil properties, and microbial diversity in soils contaminated with antibiotics. The incorporation of biochar resulted in a marked decrease in the concentrations of SAs and TCs in soil, by 55.8% and 20.9%, respectively. In biochar-amended soil, the soil properties were enhanced, with notable increases of 3.2% in pH and 36.5% in organic matter, respectively. This further enhanced soil microbial diversity, with notable increases observed in both the Chao index (19.8%) and the Shannon index (6.9%). Additionally, agricultural waste biochar pyrolyzed at 300-500 °C demonstrated superior efficiency in reducing SAs and TCs. Furthermore, the remediation efficiency increased with higher soil pH and longer application time. The results of this research provided strong evidence for the remediation of soil antibiotic contamination.

Indexed as

CharcoalSoilSoil PollutantsSulfonamidesTetracyclinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSoil MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsbiocharCharcoalSoilSoil PollutantsSulfonamidesTetracyclinesModificationOrganic pollutantRisk assessmentSoil amendment

Identifiers

PMID41310038
PMCPMC12660817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.