ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating machine learning algorithms and remote sensing for High-Resolution mapping of soil crusting in agricultural lands.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil crusting is a significant form of land degradation that adversely affects soil quality and its functional properties, particularly in agricultural lands. Accurate identification of degraded areas and optimization of soil management practices in croplands are essential to mitigate the negative impacts of soil crusting. In this study, 520 soil samples were collected from the top 10 cm of soil in a portion of agricultural lands in Shaanxi Province, China, and the Soil Crusting Index (SCI) was subsequently calculated. Two machine learning algorithms, Random Forest (RF) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), were evaluated using 26 indices derived from a digital elevation model along with 13 remotely sensed datasets. Results indicated that SCI values in the study area ranged from 0.27 to 2.69, with highest susceptibility in the northeastern parts and lowest in the southern parts. The RF model outperformed the MLR model, showing a higher coefficient of determination (R² = 0.79 vs. 0.65), lower root mean square error (RMSE = 0.161 vs. 0.242), and reduced bias (0.031 vs. 0.130). Variable importance analysis within the RF framework identified the Clay Index (CI) as the most influential predictor of SCI, while precipitation and runoff- and vegetation-related factors in agricultural lands also had substantial effects. Other examined indices contributed less significantly to model performance. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that future research employ hybrid modeling approaches combining RF with other algorithms to identify the best model for predicting soil crusting and to better understand the dynamics of soil crust formation in croplands within the study area. This approach can aid in the development of more effective management strategies to mitigate soil crusting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.