ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatio-temporal patterns and driving mechanisms of ecosystem services in mountainous regions: A multi-scale analysis of the Yanshan-Taihang mountain area.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal changes and degradation early-warning of key ecosystem services in China from 2015 to 2020.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Investigating the spatio-temporal dynamics of ecosystem services and their underlying driving factors in mountainous regions is of critical importance for ensuring regional ecological security and promoting sustainable development. Focusing on the Yanshan-Taihang Mountain area as a case study, this research applied the InVEST model to evaluate the temporal trends of four key ecosystem services-carbon storage, habitat quality, water yield, and soil conservation-between 2000 and 2023 across multiple spatial scales (1 km, 5 km, 10 km, and 15km). The study further analyzed the spatial distribution characteristics and trade-off/synergy relationships among these services. To identify key driving factors, the XGBoost-SHAP model was employed. Key findings include: (1) From 2000 to 2023, all four ecosystem services exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity. Carbon storage showed a steady upward trend, with a concentric pattern of higher values in central areas and lower values at the periphery. Habitat quality continuously declined, although relatively high levels were maintained in the central Taihang Mountains and the Yanshan region. Water yield and soil conservation capacity both followed an initial increasing and subsequent decreasing trend. Water yield displayed a south-to-north decreasing gradient, while high soil conservation capacity was predominantly concentrated in the southern part of the study area. (2) Spatial statistical analysis revealed significant clustering of high-value areas for all four services. As the spatial scale increased, the patterns of hot and cold spots became more spatially homogeneous. (3) In terms of interactions, habitat quality, carbon storage, and soil conservation demonstrated strong synergistic relationships, whereas water yield exhibited trade-off effects with the other services. These trade-off/synergy relationships were scale-dependent; while the direction remained consistent across scales, the intensity varied significantly. (4) Driving factor analysis indicated that slope exerted a substantial influence on all four services. Population density primarily affected carbon storage, habitat quality, and water yield. NDVI had a significant impact on carbon storage and soil conservation, while annual precipitation was a key determinant of water yield and soil conservation. The relationships between ecosystem services and their driving factors also varied with the spatial scale of analysis. These findings provide a scientific basis for optimizing the spatial configuration of ecosystem services and formulating targeted ecological conservation strategies in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.