ArticleScientific reports2025
Computer vision syndrome with academic burnout among college students in majors of medical and health-related fields and the moderating effect of gender.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
College students in majors of medical and health-related fields in the academic environment are at high risk of experiencing academic burnout (AB) and computer vision syndrome (CVS). This study explored the direct relationship between CVS and AB among these students. In addition, the study grounded in Job Demand-resources (JD-R) Theory and Social Role Theory constructed a moderated mediation model to examine the mediating role of academic stress (AS) and the moderating role of gender. A total of 859 college students in majors of medical and health-related fields participated in this cross-sectional study. The results demonstrated that CVS had a significant positive prediction on both AS and AB among these students, AS significantly and positively predicted AB, AS played a significant mediating role in the relationship between CVS and AB. Additionally, gender significantly moderated the prediction of CVS on AB, no significant gender difference in CVS was observed, a significant gender difference in AB was found, with males reporting significantly higher AB than females, once again confirmed in the academic environments that gender is key to understanding burnout. These findings improve our understanding of how CVS contributes to AB and the emergence of gender difference of these students' AB. Furthermore, to promote gender equality in medical and health-related fields in academic environments, this study provides actionable insights for medical education institutions to mitigate both AB and CVS according to gender differences and the relationship between CVS and AB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.