ArticleScientific reports2025
Systemic analysis of rural teacher attrition in china: a hybrid DEMATEL-ISM approach to multidimensional drivers and policy implications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rural teacher attrition in China presents a complex systemic challenge impacting educational equity and rural revitalization, necessitating multidimensional intervention strategies. This study employs an integrated DEMATEL-ISM methodology to model hierarchical interactions among 27 attrition determinants across individual, organizational, and societal dimensions. Key results indicate: (1) School size (Di = 6.303), geographical location (Di = 6.001), and compensation (Di = 5.918) dominate as causal factors, while professional identity (Ci = 6.401) and belongingness (Ci = 6.397) exhibit highest susceptibility; (2) A three-tiered structure emerges-surface-level urban-oriented preferences directly trigger attrition, intermediary factors (e.g., job burnout, resource disparities) mediate effects, and root-level institutional deficiencies (teaching environments/administrative systems) drive systemic causality through psychological and spatial pathways. We suggest that sustainable retention likely requires tripartite policy integration: optimizing material support systems, reconstructing professional identity through cultural-ecological rehabilitation, and implementing stratified interventions targeting institutional, psychological, and behavioral dimensions to disrupt attrition cascades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.