ArticleScientific reports2025
Task evoked EEG reveals neural processing differences in aphantasia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aphantasia, the inability to generate voluntary visual images, affects an estimated 3-4% of the population and provides a valuable model for examining how the brain supports cognition without imagery. Functional MRI studies have reported reduced coordination between visual and higher-order association areas involved in imagery control. However, the temporal characteristics of these neural differences remain unclear, as electroencephalographic (EEG) evidence limited to single-case studies. Here we present the first group-level EEG investigation of aphantasia, comparing 62 individuals with the condition to 59 controls during rest and tasks probing attention and working memory. In the oddball task, participants with aphantasia demonstrated smaller P300 amplitudes, an EEG index of attentional allocation and the updating of task-relevant information into working memory. Given the absence of behavioural differences between groups, we propose this result reflects reduced engagement of imagery-related processes during this task rather than diminished cognitive function. Under high working-memory load in the n-back task, individuals with aphantasia showed lower delta power-brain activity linked to regulating sensory input and maintaining internal representations. Notably, delta power was also associated with imagery vividness (VVIQ), potentially indicating greater engagement of these sensory-regulating processes in individuals with stronger imagery. Together, these findings suggest that individuals with aphantasia may rely more on non-visual strategies for information maintenance, thereby reducing sensory interference and demands on inhibitory control. This study provides the first EEG evidence that people with aphantasia have distinct-but effective-neural dynamics that support cognition without visual imagery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.