Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41309980›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Diversity and leaf dry matter yield of Woody forage species in the pastures of South Ari District, Southern Ethiopia.

Kuratu Kuke, Yilkal Tadele, Tekle Olbamo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kuratu KukeDepartment of Animal Science, Jinka University, Jinka, Ethiopia.
Yilkal TadeleDepartment of Animal Science, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. yilkaltadele@gmail.com.
Tekle OlbamoDepartment of Animal Science, Jinka University, Jinka, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study was conducted with the objective of assessing fodder tree and shrub species and their foliage yield potentials in private and communal grazing lands across different agroecological environments of South Ari district. A household survey involving 196 respondents was used to identify fodder tree and shrub species and their preferences by livestock species. To evaluate species composition and leaf dry matter yield, a total of thirty-six belt transects (40 m × 40 m for trees and 20 m × 20 m for shrubs) were established. A total of 18 fodder trees and 9 shrubs were identified in the study area, accounting for 79.0% trees and 21.0% shrubs. Among these, 42.1% were categorized as highly desirable, 36.8% as desirable, and 21.1% as less desirable. Vernonia amygdalina, Ficus ovata, Dracaena steudneri, and Terminalia laxiflora were the most frequently occurring and widely utilized fodder tree species. Livestock utilized twigs, leaves, fruits, and pods of these species as edible parts. The mean (± S.E.) leaf biomass yields of fodder trees and shrubs were 13.82 ± 0.613 kg/tree and 2.97 ± 0.464 kg/shrub, respectively. Future work should focus on nutritional evaluation and controlled livestock feeding trials to determine the actual feed value and contribution of these species to livestock productivity.

Indexed as

Animal FeedBiodiversityPlant LeavesTreesAnimalsBiomassEthiopiaLivestockCompositionLeaf yieldProductivitySpecies

Identifiers

PMID41309980
PMCPMC12749850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.