ArticleScientific reports2025
Examining Japanese laypeople's nationality preferences for physicians: a nationwide study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceived Impact of Virtual Reality-Based Education for History-Taking and Physical Examination Skills among International Medical Graduates in Japan: A Feasible One-Group Pretest-Posttest Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate physician nationality preferences of Japanese laypeople and the reasons behind the preferences. We performed a nationwide study in May 2025. The participants were monitors of an internet survey company who responded to closed questions regarding nationality preferences across different physician qualities and clinical scenarios, along with open-ended questions regarding their expectations and concerns about care by foreign national physicians. We analyzed responses to the closed questions by descriptive statistics. We compared responses between individuals with prior experience of seeing a foreign national physician and those without such experiences by chi-square test. For free-text responses, we performed inductive content analysis. Among 2004 respondents, approximately half to two-thirds preferred Japanese physicians. Participants with prior experience of seeing a foreign national physician were significantly less likely to indicate a nationality-concordant preference. In free-text responses, 337 participants provided expectations (360 codes) and 938 provided concerns (982 codes). Among concerns, 723 codes were labelled as a language barrier. Participants expressed expectations of the possible strengths of foreign national physicians. This study clarified the nationality preferences of Japanese laypeople in physician selection. The findings have significant implications, including the necessity of reconsidering medical education strategies, public education, and inclusive policy frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.