ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of ice stunning versus electronarcosis on European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) muscle structure, ultrastructure and quality traits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the aquaculture industry has seen an increasing concern regarding the welfare of fish, particularly the slaughter and stunning processes, one of the most significant wellbeing issues. Despite the critical role of stunning methods in fish processing, studies examining their impact on the structural integrity of muscle tissue and the overall quality of fish have been relatively scarce. In this context, the current study subjected adult European sea bass with an average weight of 693.8 ± 71.6 to two distinct stunning methods prior to slaughter: immersion in ice water and electronarcosis (with a voltage of 40 V and frequency of 50 Hz for 15 s) to examine their effect on muscle and quality parameters. Immersion in ice water resulted in better and more preserved muscle organization. Electronarcosis exhibited higher K values (p < 0.05) and a softer texture (p < 0.05) with less gumminess (p < 0.05), including changes at electrolyte levels (P: p < 0.001; K: p < 0.036). No significant differences were found in plasma stress biomarkers, including cortisol (814 vs. 966 ng/mL for ice-water and electronarcosis, respectively), glucose (7.34 vs. 7.28 mmol/L), and lactate (9.12 vs. 10.12 mmol/L). In conclusion, stunning in ice water seemed to induce minimal effects on the muscle structure and ultrastructure and maintain product quality, while electronarcosis appeared to diminish quality traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.