ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving quercetin solubility via structural modification enhances dual-target coronavirus entry: an integrated in-vitro and in-silico study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Antidiabetic Activity of Phenolic Compounds from NADES-Extracted SunGold Kiwifruit and Their Fortification in Yoghurt.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Anti-Inflammatory Activity ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The modified quercetin derivatives have recently emerged as promising therapeutic candidates, as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic continues to underscore the urgent need for potent antiviral agents. We hypothesized that quercetin penta-phosphate (QPP) and quercetin para-aminobenzoic acid (QPABA) could act as potential inhibitors of spike protein-receptor binding and accordingly synthesized and characterized them. ELISA assays demonstrated that QPABA exhibited the most potent inhibitory activity, with IC50 values of 12.02 µM and 14.4 µM for DPP4–MERS-CoV and ACE2-SARS-CoV-2-spike complex, respectively (p values < 0.0005). Consistently, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations revealed that QPABA exhibited the strongest binding affinity among all tested compounds, showing the lowest binding energy (− 10.2 kcal/mol) toward the DPP4-MERS-CoV spike complex by disrupting the key electrostatic interaction between DPP4 residue K267 and viral residue D539. A similarly strong interaction was observed with the ACE2–SARS-CoV-2 spike complex (− 9.4 kcal/mol), through blocking hotspot residues (F456, Y489, I472, and L492). Additionally, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of QPABA and QPP were evaluated by POM analysis, supporting their potential for therapeutic development. While QPP offers improved aqueous behavior for formulation versatility, QPABA demonstrates strong spike–receptor interactions suitable for next-generation antiviral agent development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.