ArticleScientific reports2025
Double-strand break-free and transgene-free genome editing in the microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica using removable vectors containing the CRISPR base editing system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- CRISPR-Cas technologies for precision genome editing in plants: advances, applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accumulation of lipids by algae makes them attractive for carbon-neutral fuel production; however, the industrial-scale production of algal lipids has yet to be achieved. Currently, researchers are trying to improve the lipid productivity of algal strains using genome editing for molecular breeding with CRISPR-Cas9, which allows the efficient alteration of genomic information. However, CRISPR-based gene modification via double-strand breaks sometimes induces unintended large deletions that are toxic to host cells. Here, we applied the cytidine base editor combined with an episomal vector backbone containing a centromere and autonomous replication sequence to the microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica. The cytosine base editor introduces cytidine-to-thymidine base substitutions using deaminase without double-strand breaks, and an episomal vector enables plasmid removal after base substitution. We succeeded in inducing cytidine-to-thymidine substitution at the six target sites of five endogenous genes. The base substitution activity ranged from 29.2% to 47.6% on cytidine bases at the 16th to 19th positions from the protospacer adjacent motifs. The removal of base editor plasmids was also detected, which is essential for constructing transgene-free strains. Our results provide insights into the applicability of further technologies in the genetic modification of microalgae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.